‘Pierre Trudeau on Legal Equality’

It’s too bad that Trudeau Junior didn’t bother to read what his father wrote:

“It is no small matter to know whether we are going to live in a society in which personal rights, individual rights, take precedence over collective rights. It is no minor question of secondary importance to know whether we are going to live in a society in which all citizens are equal before the law and before the State itself…

“When each citizen is not equal to all other citizens in the state, we are faced with a dictatorship which arranges citizens in a hierarchy according to their beliefs…

‘The Charter Is A Trojan Horse’ (LINK)

“The Charter is a Trojan Horse. What else would you expect from Pierre Trudeau?

“First off, there is the “reasonable limits” clause in the very first section.

“Then, we have the ludicrous “Notwithstanding Clause” that allows any provincial government to override citizens’ so-called ‘rights’.

“And finally, we have the deceitful ‘Section 15’, where individual legal rights are ‘guaranteed’ in 15(1), but then immediately superceded by the ‘group rights’ delineated in 15(2)…”
https://constitutioncdn.wordpress.com/2021/01/05/the-charter-is-a-trojan-horse/

‘When Will We Ever Be Equal?’

“Quebec considers itself a Nation within Canada, just as the Aboriginals do. We are not all equal in this country. When will we ever be equal?”

Upon being asked the above question, this was our response: 

‘Manipulating A Flawed Charter’

Here’s a chance for a judge to act responsibly – while throwing this out of court, give these children a lecture on wasting the court’s time. Their lawyers are attempting to use the ‘social justice’ Section 15(2) of the Charter {see below} which undermines the ‘equality rights’ supposedly guaranteed in Section 15(1). P.S. Once again, in what’s become an ongoing pattern, American interference is involved…

“A lawsuit that’s expected to be filed Friday claiming young people disproportionately suffer the effects of climate change is potentially precedent setting — but also a tough case to argue, legal experts say.

‘Suppressing Free Speech At Election Time’

“A Canadian civil liberties group has launched an urgent application against the Trudeau government in the name of free speech… The Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF), a non-partisan charity, states in documents prepared for the Ontario Superior Court that the government’s new election law violates the Charter rights of Canadians who wish to voice their opinions in the current election campaign.

‘Freedom of Speech and ‘Islamophobia’

There is an anti-‘Islamophobia’ Liberal Muslim private members Motion in Parliament, presented by a Muslim MP, that would take us one step closer to criminalizing criticism of Islam:

“Canada is on the verge of passing what amounts to Islamic blasphemy laws. 

“Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Government is quickly proceeding to address unproven increases of “Islamophobia” {‘criticism of Islam’} — and he’s going to do it by curbing the right to free speech.

‘The Strange Case of Canadian ‘Legal Equality’

‘Section 15(1)’ of the ‘Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ contains the constitutional guarantee of equality and it states:

‘Equality before and under law, and equal protection and benefit of law’

(1) “Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.” 

Then, this Principle is immediately undermined by:

‘Affirmative action programs’

(2) “Subsection (1) does not preclude any law, program or activity that has as its object the amelioration of conditions of disadvantaged individuals or groups including those that are disadvantaged because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.”
http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/const/page-15.html

The political — and therefore, ‘flexible’ — tool that is subsection (2) means that the Constitutional Principle of Section 15(1) cannot really exist as a ‘Principle’, and merely serves as an inspirational introduction to the court-driven social engineering enabled by subsection (2).

As a result, legal equality of individual Canadian citizens has become a thing of the past.